Upon Haniyeh’s arrival at the airport in Tunis, frenzied crowd scenes ensued, featuring call and response chanting: “Killing the Jews…is a duty, Crushing the Jews…is a duty.” It was truly the sort of perverse welcome befitting a senior terrorist, in a region where such killers are worshipped as heroes.
Al-Aqsa TV, Hamas’ channel in Gaza, broadcast similarly charming material involving Haniyeh himself, such as a friendly chant with Tunisian officials seemingly for the cameras. One highlight of the chant included death-cultish ladder of skulls imagery:
“We respond to your [Haniyeh’s] call, turn our skulls into a ladder for your glory. We respond to your call, and will sacrifice our blood for you. We respond to your call, turn our skulls into a ladder for your glory.”
Haniya delivered a number of speeches which displayed an apocalyptic vision that would impress fans of the Medieval gothic aesthetic, such as: “Dark days await you O Israel” and “Your honor is the honor of Palestine — Palestine from the [Mediterranean] Sea to the [Jordan] River.” The latter is a by now de rigueur statement at every pro-Palestinian event, an expressed wish for the total annihilation of Israel.“Resistance, resistance — no peace and no concessions.”
“May the glory of Islam be restored.”
“May the purity of Al-Aqsa [the primary mosque in Jerusalem] be restored.”
“May our blood be shed.”
“May their [Israeli Jews] blood be shed.”
“Allah willing, you will join the army that will conquer Jerusalem.” [Haniya to a young boy]
The religious significance of the conflict for Hamas was also evident in Haniya’s words:
The land of Palestine, oh brothers and sisters, is an Islamic waqf, as decreed by the second caliph, Omar ibn Al-Khattab [lived circa 586 to 644, a companion to Muhammad, later a ruler of the then rapidly expanding Islamic empire]. We shall not relinquish the Islamic waqf on the land of Palestine, and Jerusalem shall not be divided into Western and Eastern Jerusalem.
The prime minister in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip on Sunday promised “difficult days” for Israel, and at a rally in Tunis urged Arab Spring revolutionaries to fight for an independent Palestine. Ismail Haniya received an ovation from the crowd of some 5,000 men, women and children gathered in a stadium…
“Israel no longer has allies in Egypt and in Tunisia, we are saying to the Zionist enemies that times have changed and that the time of the Arab Spring, the time of the revolution, of dignity and of pride has arrived,” he said to loud cheers.
“We promise you that we will not cede a single part of Palestine, we will not cede Jerusalem, we will continue to fight and we will not lay down our arms,” he said. He urged “the people of the revolution to fight the army of Al-Quds” as Jerusalem is known in Arabic.
Haniya insisted “We will not recognise Israel”, as the crowd chanted: “Death to Israel”, “The Tunisian revolution supports Palestine”, and “The army of Mohammed is back”.
Some wiped their feet on the Star of David.
Haniyeh’s words are further proof that Hamas has absolutely no desire to abandon its intent of destroying Israel through conflict. That in itself is nothing new as inciting against Israel is very much a defining feature of Hamas and their charter which clearly advocates genocide: “The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees…”
Astonishingly however, a very substantial contingent of pro-Palestinians blithely deny or whitewash Hamas’ debased acts and its character. As with the nuclear threat from Iran, such people pretend that Israel does not face any medium/long-term risks to its existence from Hamas. This is because Israel’s utter demonisation, which they evidently seek, is incompatible with any concession that it faces danger.
US ex-president Jimmy Carter is one such advocate. Carter has repeatedly asserted that Hamas would accept a two-state solution. For example, Carter went to the West Bank in 2008, and claimed that they would recognise Israel. However, that assertion was soon denounced by Hamas’ senior official in Damascus, one Khaled Meshaal. It turned out that Carter’s assertion that Hamas would accept a two-state solution was actually just part of a two-stage solution as asserted repeatedly by senior Hamas officials. One could (with charity) call it wishful thinking on Carter’s part.
Whether through malice or an extraordinary naivete, such people assert that Hamas is actually quite a reasonable organisation that the “Zionist Lobby” (TM) demonised. They claim Hamas is the legitimate (democratically elected) representatives of Gaza rather than a group that threw dissenters off the top of tall buildings during a nasty coup. Hamas’ creeping legitimisation has led other anti-Israeli politicians to demand that Hamas be included in the peace process. Two examples are Ireland’s newly elected President, Michael D. Higgins, who demanded Hamas be taken off Europe’s proscribed organisations list, and Norway’s FM Jonas Gahr Stoere. However, the speeches in Tunisia, as elsewhere, demonstrate that this is a religious conflict, where absolute Islamic supremacy is the long-term aim. This should be blindingly obvious since Muslims the world over take issue with Israel’s very existence.
The statements in Tunisia were in keeping with other recent remarks by Ismail Haniyeh at a ceremony celebrating Hamas’ 24th anniversary. It was asserted they may seek an “interim objective of liberation of Gaza, the West Bank, or Jerusalem,” but an “interim objective” is merely that. It would not change Hamas’ long-term goal of liquidating Israel:
We won’t relinquish one inch of the land of Palestine… [Hamas will] lead Intifada after Intifada until we liberate Palestine — all of Palestine, Allah willing. Allah Akbar…
Hamas was loosing popularity especially in the aftermath of the 2009 Gaza war. However, 2011 became highly fortuitous for the group. Firstly, they received a much needed boost when the selective and highly misleading leaks, typically referred to as the “Palestine Papers”, portrayed Fatah as weaklings when negotiating with Israel in 2008. The leaks gravely damaged their credibility. Secondly, the optimistically titled “Arab Spring” threw off the relatively moderate secular chains that impeded Hamas’ spiritual forefathers, the Muslim Brotherhood, from gaining power in Egypt, and elsewhere.
Hamas asserted that the visit demonstrated that the organisation has achieved a great level of international recognition although the sharp transformation in the Arab world is also partly behind their rising acceptance. Haniya’s considerable Tunisian welcome was at the invitation of the new Islamist authorities, and he also visited Egypt and Sudan.
Notably Haniya’s visit didn’t please the Palestinian Authority, which claimed invitations should have gone through official diplomatic lines. It would appear that the more secular Fatah party, which leads the PA, will be increasingly sidelined by the Islamist leadership in Tunisia and Egypt, whilst the Muslim Brotherhood looks set to take Syria as well. Haniya’s invite to Tunisia can be seen as another sign that a sharp re-alignment is taking place in the Middle East, where it appears that Islamic extremists will bring about a new chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This article was also published at Crethi Plethi.